The CPD Register Logo

Elite Standards Accreditation

Commercial identification and contactability

Elite Standards Accreditation operates a website at www.elitestandardsaccreditation.com, presenting itself as "the premier accreditation company for hair, beauty, and aesthetics professionals." No legal entity is disclosed anywhere on the website -- neither the homepage nor the contact page identifies the registered company name, company number, or legal form behind the trading name "Elite Standards Accreditation."

A search of Companies House conducted on 11th June 2026 returned no registered entity corresponding to the trading name "Elite Standards Accreditation" or any closely matching variant. No company number, incorporation record, or director information is therefore publicly available. It is not possible to determine from the website or from Companies House whether this organisation is operated by a limited company, a sole trader, a partnership, or another legal form.

The contact page at https://www.elitestandardsaccreditation.com/contact-us (accessed 11th June 2026) displays two separate and inconsistent sets of contact details. Under the heading "HEADQUARTERS" the page states "St. James Square, Mayfair, London, W1J 6BT." However, the website footer on the same page and across the site states "66 Paul Street, London, England, EC2A 4NA." These are materially different addresses in different parts of London, and no explanation is offered for the discrepancy. EC2A 4NA is a postcode in the Shoreditch/Old Street area; W1J 6BT is in Mayfair. It is not possible to determine which, if either, represents a genuine operational or registered address.

The contact page further lists two separate email addresses: "[email protected]" (on the contact form) and "[email protected]" (in the footer), the latter referring to a different domain to the website. No telephone number is published on the contact page itself; a mobile number (07453163191) appears only in the footer.

The absence of any identified legal entity, combined with conflicting and unverified address information and inconsistent contact details, means that the organisation cannot be reliably identified or served with legal correspondence. This falls materially short of the transparency standard expected of a CPD accreditation body under the Companies Act 2006 trading disclosure requirements (sections 1200--1206) and represents a significant risk to training providers and consumers seeking accountability or redress.

Source: https://www.elitestandardsaccreditation.com/home (accessed 11th June 2026); https://www.elitestandardsaccreditation.com/contact-us (accessed 11th June 2026); Companies House search at https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk (accessed 11th June 2026).

Transparency of assessment framework

No assessment framework, accreditation criteria, or evaluation standards are published on the Elite Standards Accreditation website. The homepage at https://www.elitestandardsaccreditation.com/home (accessed 11th June 2026) describes a four-step process: "Secure Application," "Elite Panel Assessment," "Formal Verification," and "Prestige Certification." Each step is described in broad, generic terms. Step 2 states that "our board of expert assessors conducts a high-level review of your safety protocols and quality standards to ensure industry compliance," but no criteria, standards, benchmarks, or documented assessment methodology are published to support this description.

The website makes no reference to any published framework against which safety protocols or quality standards are assessed. No accreditation policy document, assessment guide, or standards document is linked or otherwise available on the website. A full review of the sitemap (https://www.elitestandardsaccreditation.com/pages-sitemap.xml, accessed 11th June 2026) confirms that only two public pages exist: the homepage and the contact page. No criteria, standards, or methodology page is published.

The absence of a published assessment framework means that training providers applying for accreditation have no basis on which to understand what they are being assessed against, and consumers have no means of understanding what accreditation by this body represents. A description of an assessment process is not equivalent to a published framework.

Source: https://www.elitestandardsaccreditation.com/home (accessed 11th June 2026); https://www.elitestandardsaccreditation.com/pages-sitemap.xml (accessed 11th June 2026).

Pricing transparency

Pricing for accreditation packages is published on the Plans and Pricing page at https://www.elitestandardsaccreditation.com/pricing-plans/programslist (accessed 11th June 2026). Four packages are listed:

Pay Monthly: £49 per month on a 12-month contract
Bronze Package: £100 (valid 12 months) -- described as covering accreditation for one course
Silver Membership: £249 (valid 12 months) -- described as covering accreditation for up to five courses
Gold Package: £399 (valid 12 months) -- described as covering unlimited course accreditation

Pricing is therefore published and broadly accessible. However, several observations are noted. First, additional costs are associated with accreditation that are not consolidated within the pricing page: the website's shop at https://www.elitestandardsaccreditation.com/category/all-products (accessed 11th June 2026) sells a "Level 3 AET -- Train The Trainer" qualification for £95, which the product description states is "required in order to gain accreditation with Elite Standards Accreditation." This mandatory prerequisite cost is not disclosed within the pricing page. An "Additional Educator" add-on is also available for £150 per additional person.

Second, the Gold Package claims to provide "unlimited course accreditation" -- assessed individually -- for a total of £399 per annum. This pricing level raises a substantive question about the depth and independence of the assessment process described elsewhere on the site, particularly given the absence of any published assessment criteria.

Source: https://www.elitestandardsaccreditation.com/pricing-plans/programslist (accessed 11th June 2026); https://www.elitestandardsaccreditation.com/category/all-products (accessed 11th June 2026).

Terms and conditions

No terms and conditions are published on the Elite Standards Accreditation website. A full review of all publicly accessible pages -- the homepage, the contact page, the pricing page, and the shop product pages -- confirmed the absence of any terms and conditions document, terms of service, or accreditation agreement.

The website operates an e-commerce function through which accreditation packages and training products can be purchased directly. The collection of payment and personal data in the absence of published terms and conditions represents a material transparency failure. Training providers and individuals making purchases through the website have no published basis on which to understand the duration of accreditation, renewal obligations, refund and cancellation rights, conditions for withdrawal of accreditation, intellectual property provisions relating to submitted course materials, or any dispute resolution mechanism.

The absence of published terms is particularly significant given that the Pay Monthly package involves a stated "12-month accreditation contract." The existence of a contractual commitment is referenced in the pricing description, but no contract terms are accessible to prospective purchasers before or at the point of purchase.

Source: https://www.elitestandardsaccreditation.com/pricing-plans/programslist (accessed 11th June 2026); https://www.elitestandardsaccreditation.com/pages-sitemap.xml (accessed 11th June 2026).

Individual course assessment

The pricing structure at https://www.elitestandardsaccreditation.com/pricing-plans/programslist (accessed 11th June 2026) references course-level accreditation. The Bronze Package is described as covering "accreditation for 1 course," the Silver Membership as covering "accreditation for up to 5 courses," and the Gold Package as covering "unlimited course accreditation." This language implies that individual courses are the unit of accreditation.

However, no information is published on the website about what individual course assessment involves in practice -- what documentation is submitted, what criteria are applied, or how individual courses are distinguished and assessed. Given that no published assessment framework exists (see Section 2), it is not possible to verify whether individual course assessment is genuinely conducted, or whether the course-count model in the pricing structure reflects substantive individual assessment or simply a tiered usage allowance.

The Gold Package -- unlimited course accreditation for £399 per annum -- particularly raises questions about whether genuine individual assessment of each course is practicable at this price point, in the absence of any published criteria or process documentation.
Source: https://www.elitestandardsaccreditation.com/pricing-plans/programslist (accessed 11th June 2026).

Review and renewal

No review or renewal cycle is published on the Elite Standards Accreditation website. The pricing descriptions indicate that accreditation packages are "valid for 12 months," and the Pay Monthly option is described as a "12-month accreditation contract." However, no information is provided about what happens at the end of the 12-month period -- whether accredited courses are reassessed before renewal, whether updated course materials are reviewed, or whether renewal is automatic on payment.

The absence of any published renewal or re-assessment process means that accreditation granted at the point of initial application may not be subject to any ongoing quality assurance. For training providers and consumers relying on accreditation status as a quality indicator, the lack of a defined and published review cycle is a transparency gap.

Source: https://www.elitestandardsaccreditation.com/pricing-plans/programslist (accessed 11th June 2026).

Sale of training courses or materials

Elite Standards Accreditation operates a shop at https://www.elitestandardsaccreditation.com/category/all-products (accessed 11th June 2026) through which it sells training courses and materials directly. Two products are listed:

1. Level 3 AET -- Train The Trainer (£95): described as "an entry-level teaching qualification for individuals delivering training, workshops, or vocational courses professionally." The product description states that it is "required in order to gain accreditation with Elite Standards Accreditation." The course is delivered as a PDF file containing learning materials, assessment guidance, and templates, with completed work returned to Elite Standards Accreditation for marking and certification.
2. Additional Educator (£150): an add-on permitting additional trainers to be added to an existing accreditation membership.

The sale of training products by an accreditation body is a structural matter that this register records factually. What is particularly significant in this case is that the Level 3 AET product is explicitly described as a prerequisite for accreditation. This creates a direct financial dependency: a training provider cannot obtain accreditation from Elite Standards Accreditation without first purchasing and completing a training product sold by Elite Standards Accreditation. The accreditor is therefore a mandatory supplier of a commercial product to those seeking its accreditation.

Furthermore, Elite Standards Accreditation is described as conducting the marking and certification of the Level 3 AET qualification it sells. This means the same organisation acts as course seller, marker, certifier, and accreditation gatekeeper -- roles that are not separated and that raise a material question about the independence of the accreditation function.

Source: https://www.elitestandardsaccreditation.com/category/all-products (accessed 11th June 2026); https://www.elitestandardsaccreditation.com/product-page/level-3-aet-train-the-trainer (accessed 11th June 2026).

Financial relationships with third-party service providers

No financial relationships with third-party service providers -- such as insurance providers, legal services, or other commercial referral arrangements -- are disclosed or referenced on the Elite Standards Accreditation website. No affiliate arrangements, referral fees, or commercial partnerships are mentioned in the publicly accessible pages.

Source: https://www.elitestandardsaccreditation.com/home (accessed 11th June 2026); https://www.elitestandardsaccreditation.com/contact-us (accessed 11th June 2026).

Ownership or control relationships with aligned commercial interests

No legal entity behind Elite Standards Accreditation has been identified on Companies House. As a result, it is not possible to conduct a standard officer appointments check to assess whether the individuals controlling Elite Standards Accreditation also control connected training providers or other aligned commercial interests.

The structural findings noted in Section 7 are relevant to this section. Elite Standards Accreditation sells a training qualification (the Level 3 AET) that it describes as a mandatory prerequisite for obtaining its accreditation. The organisation also conducts the marking and certification of that qualification. These roles -- course seller, marker, certifier, and accreditation body -- are all held by the same unidentified legal entity.

This concentration of functions in an unidentified entity, operating without published company details, ICO registration, or terms and conditions, represents a material opacity risk.

The absence of any identifiable legal entity means that interested parties -- training providers, consumers, or researchers -- cannot independently verify ownership, control, or connected interests through the statutory registers available for UK-registered companies.

Source: https://www.elitestandardsaccreditation.com/product-page/level-3-aet-train-the-trainer (accessed 11th June 2026); Companies House search at https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk (accessed 11th June 2026).

Consistency of filings with advertised activity

No registered legal entity corresponding to Elite Standards Accreditation has been identified on Companies House following searches conducted on 11th June 2026. The trading name "Elite Standards Accreditation" contains multiple words that appear on the UK Intellectual Property Office's Annex A list of sensitive words and expressions requiring specific justification or consent for use in company names -- including "Standards," "Accreditation," and by its nature the combination implies a quality assurance and regulatory function. The use of a trading name including "Accreditation" and "Standards" by an unregistered entity, or an entity that has not disclosed its registered identity, means that the appropriateness of the name under the Companies Act 2006 and associated naming regulations cannot be assessed.

Without a registered entity, there are no Companies House filings to assess for consistency with advertised activity, no SIC codes on record, no confirmation of an appropriate registered office address, and no PSC register or director information accessible to the public.

Source: Companies House search at https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk (accessed 11th June 2026).

Companies House status

No company registration corresponding to Elite Standards Accreditation has been identified on Companies House. Searches conducted on 11th June 2026 using the full trading name "Elite Standards Accreditation," variants of the name, and the address published in the website footer (66 Paul Street, London, EC2A 4NA) returned no matching registered entity.

It cannot be determined from available public records whether the organisation is operated by an unregistered sole trader, a limited company that has not disclosed its registered identity, or some other legal form. The absence of any identifiable company registration means that the statutory transparency mechanisms available for UK limited companies -- including the public record of directors, persons with significant control, filing history, and registered office -- are not available for this organisation.

Source: Companies House search at https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk (accessed 11th June 2026).

Website status

The Elite Standards Accreditation website at www.elitestandardsaccreditation.com was live and accessible at the time of this review on 11th June 2026. The website is built on the Wix platform and operates a functional e-commerce store. The sitemap confirms two main public pages (homepage and contact page) alongside the pricing and shop sections. No error pages, suspended notices, or access restrictions were encountered on the publicly accessible pages reviewed. The password-protected "challenges" section at https://www.elitestandardsaccreditation.com/challenges was not accessible.

Source: https://www.elitestandardsaccreditation.com/sitemap.xml (accessed 11th June 2026).

Regulatory rulings and public enforcement records

No rulings or public enforcement records relating to Elite Standards Accreditation were identified in a search of the Advertising Standards Authority rulings database conducted on 11th June 2026. No records were identified from other regulatory bodies.

Source: ASA rulings database at https://www.asa.org.uk/codes-and-rulings/rulings.html (accessed 11th June 2026).

Distinguishing CPD from regulated qualifications

Elite Standards Accreditation sells a product described as a "Level 3 AET -- Train The Trainer" qualification at https://www.elitestandardsaccreditation.com/product-page/level-3-aet-train-the-trainer (accessed 11th June 2026). The product description states that it is "an entry-level teaching qualification for individuals delivering training, workshops, or vocational courses professionally" and that it covers "lesson planning, teaching methods, learner engagement, assessments, and classroom delivery skills." It is described as "widely recognised within the UK training industry."

The use of "Level 3" terminology and the word "qualification" in this context requires careful scrutiny. A regulated Level 3 Award in Education and Training (AET) would be a qualification delivered through an Ofqual-recognised awarding organisation with a registered qualification number on the Ofqual Register of Regulated Qualifications. The product sold by Elite Standards Accreditation is delivered as a PDF file, with completed work returned to Elite Standards Accreditation itself for marking and certification. No awarding organisation is identified, no qualification number is provided, and no reference is made to Ofqual recognition.

The product description does not state that this is a CPD-accredited course rather than a regulated qualification, nor does it clarify that the "Level 3" designation does not indicate regulated qualification status under the national qualifications framework. The use of "Level 3," "qualification," and "widely recognised" language without these clarifications creates a material risk that prospective purchasers may believe they are obtaining a regulated teaching qualification when this has not been established from the published information.

Source: https://www.elitestandardsaccreditation.com/product-page/level-3-aet-train-the-trainer (accessed 11th June 2026).

Unsubstantiated claims

The Elite Standards Accreditation website contains a number of marketing claims that are not substantiated by any published evidence.
The homepage at https://www.elitestandardsaccreditation.com/home (accessed 11th June 2026) describes the organisation as "the premier accreditation company for hair, beauty, and aesthetics professionals" and refers to "the industry's most recognised seal of excellence." No evidence is published to support the claim that the organisation is the foremost accreditor in its sector, or that its seal is the most widely recognised among competitors. These are superlative claims of market position that require substantiation under CAP Code rules 3.1 (misleading advertising) and 3.7 (substantiation).

The same page states that accreditation will allow training providers to "elevate your professional profile with the industry's most recognised seal of excellence" and describes the organisation as providing "the recognition your craftsmanship deserves." The accredited directory section describes Elite Standards Accreditation as "the definitive hallmark for practitioners in the hair, beauty, and aesthetics industry."
The organisation's own "Standards and Transparency" section on the homepage acknowledges that the accreditation "is a voluntary professional recognition and does not serve as a replacement for mandatory government regulatory licenses, occupational permits, or health and safety certifications required by law." This disclaimer is appropriate, but it sits in tension with the superlative positioning claims used elsewhere on the same page, and does not constitute substantiation for those claims.

No independent verification, market research, industry body recognition, or other evidential basis for any of the superlative claims is published or referenced.

Source: https://www.elitestandardsaccreditation.com/home (accessed 11th June 2026).

Further Information about this organisation

Companies House Number
No registered legal entity identified
Companies House Incorporation Date
No registered legal entity identified
ICO Number
No registration identified
ICO Registration Date
No registration identified
Physical Office Published
Conflicting information published -- see Section 1
Live Chat
No
Pricing Published
Yes
Accreditation Criteria Published
No
Activities Individually Accredited
Unclear
Review Frequency
Not published
Last Updated
11th June 2026

Disclaimer

We do our best to ensure that all information is accurate and up to date. If you are part of the above-mentioned organisation and some of the information, we have found is inaccurate please contact us at [email protected] so we can rectify this for you.

Methodology and Criteria for CPD Accreditation Organisation Listings