The following specific claims published on the IEAC website require substantiation and cannot be verified from primary sources:
Over 400 years of combined experience (homepage). No methodology for arriving at this aggregate figure is stated, and no primary source evidence is provided.
Globally Recognised Accreditation Body (homepage heading). No evidence of formal recognition by any named government, intergovernmental body, or recognised quality assurance authority is provided to support this unqualified claim.
Standards adopted and accepted by most Governments worldwide (about-IEAC.php). No list of governments, intergovernmental decisions, or primary source citations are provided to support this claim.
EQAR alignment (about-IEAC.php). As noted in Section 14, IEAC does not appear on the EQAR register. The reference to EQAR in the context of the organisation's standards is unsubstantiated and potentially misleading.
IVETA membership with automatic acceptance (homepage). IVETA membership criteria are set by IVETA. The claim that accredited institutions gain automatic acceptance as IVETA members through IEAC is unsubstantiated and may be misleading to institutions considering the value of IEAC accreditation.
Membership announcement (homepage carousel). The homepage carousel states that IEAC has been accepted as a member of an organisation, the full name of which was not fully visible during this review. This claim should be verified against the named organisation's public membership register before it is treated as substantiated.
Sources:
https://www.ieac.org.uk/ — homepage, accessed 27 May 2026
https://www.ieac.org.uk/about-IEAC.php — accessed 27 May 2026