The following claims published on the website are not accompanied by verifiable supporting evidence and fall for consideration under CAP Code rules 3.1 and 3.7.
The homepage states the organisation offers "accreditation to the best hair and beauty training providers worldwide" and that members are "offering the highest level of industry-recognised training." These are superlative claims. No independent verification, benchmark, or objective basis for characterising members as "the best" or their training as "the highest level" is published. Source:
https://internationalapprovalltd.com/, accessed 24th June 2026.
The homepage states that the organisation's accreditation is "recognised in most countries by a variety of insurance providers." The claim that recognition extends to "most countries" is a quantitative comparative claim for which no supporting evidence is published. Source:
https://internationalapprovalltd.com/, accessed 24th June 2026.
The how-to-apply page describes the organisation as "an Independent Approval Accreditation Company." Given that the same legal entity both trains prospective training providers through The Rise Programme and subsequently approves their courses through the same commercial structure — including a published discount on approval for programme graduates — the claim to independence is not substantiated by any published governance framework, separation of functions, or independent oversight arrangements. Source:
https://www.internationalapprovalltd.com/how-to-apply, accessed 24th June 2026.