The CPD Register Logo
Search CPD Accreditation Bett UK 2026 Investigate About Blog Record CPD

More

What is CPD What does CPD Mean How to get a training course accredited Is CPD a Qualification Blanket Accreditation
Become a Certified CPD Accreditation Organisation Research Project

Online Teaching Course Accreditation Committee (OTCAC)

Commercial Identification and Contactability

OTCAC presents itself as "The Online Teaching Course Accreditation Committee" and describes itself as a UK-based accreditation body. The organisation cannot be identified as a registered legal entity on Companies House. Searches conducted on 14 May 2026 using both the trading abbreviation "OTCAC" and the full stated name "Online Teaching Course Accreditation Committee" returned no matching results.

The organisation's own published standards document — hosted on the OTCAC domain and dated January 2017 — uses a further distinct name: "Online Training Certification Accreditation Committee (OTCAC)." This produces three name variations across the website and its supporting documentation, with no explanation or disclosure of any trading name history provided.

No physical trading or registered address is published anywhere on the website. Contact information is limited to a single email address and an on-site enquiry form. No telephone number is provided.

No company registration number, registered address, or other statutory identifier is displayed on the website, in the footer, or on any page reviewed, as required under the Companies Act 2006, sections 1200–1206, for businesses operating under a trading name. The legal person or persons behind OTCAC are not publicly identified. The "Who We Are" section on the homepage refers only to "our lead accreditor" and "OTCAC's founders" without naming any individual.

Source: https://otcac.com/ — accessed 14 May 2026
Source: https://otcac.com/contact/ — accessed 14 May 2026
Source: https://otcac.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/OTCAC-Standards-for-Accreditation.pdf — accessed 14 May 2026
Source: https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/search?q=OTCAC — accessed 14 May 2026
Source: https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/search?q=Online+Teaching+Course+Accreditation+Committee — accessed 14 May 2026

Transparency of Assessment Framework

OTCAC publishes a standards document titled OTCAC Standards for Accreditation, available as a PDF hosted on the OTCAC domain. The document sets out eight standards against which institutions are assessed: Mission, Management, Finances, Curricula, Instructional Delivery, Instructional Personnel, Admissions and Student Services, and Evaluation. The standards are substantive and include criteria relating to curriculum design, performance measurement, instructor qualifications, student progress monitoring, and refund policies.
However, two material concerns arise from the document itself.

Name inconsistency: The PDF header refers to the organisation as "Online Training Certification Accreditation Committee (OTCAC)," whereas the live website consistently uses "Online Teaching Course Accreditation Committee." These are distinct names and no explanation is provided for the discrepancy.

Date inconsistency: The standards document is dated January 2017, two years before the organisation's own stated founding date of 2019. This is irreconcilable on the face of the document and raises questions about the provenance of the published framework.

Accessibility: The standards document is not directly linked from the main website navigation. The "Accreditation Standards" navigation link on the website redirected to the homepage on 14 May 2026 and did not resolve to a distinct page or the PDF. The document appears to be hosted on the domain but is not actively signposted to prospective clients.

The accreditation process is described in broad terms on the homepage: OTCAC reviews the provider's website and details, contacts the provider, and — once 50% of the fee is paid — accesses course materials and checks them against its benchmarks. The eight-standard framework in the PDF provides the basis for this assessment, but the two-way link between the process description on the live site and the published standards document is not made clear to prospective clients.

Source: https://otcac.com/ — accessed 14 May 2026
Source: https://otcac.com/accreditation-standards/ — accessed 14 May 2026 (redirects to homepage; no standards content found)
Source: https://otcac.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/OTCAC-Standards-for-Accreditation.pdf — accessed 14 May 2026

Pricing Transparency

OTCAC publishes its fee schedule publicly on its pricing page without requiring login or prior engagement. The following fees were displayed at the time of review:

Initial accreditation (Year 1):

60–120-hour course: £499, payable as a £250 deposit and £249 final payment
121–170-hour course: £648, payable as £324 each
171–220-hour course: £797, payable as £399 deposit and £398 final payment

Annual membership (Years 2–5):

60–120-hour course: £349
121–170-hour course: £448
171–220-hour course: £547

5-year re-accreditation (Year 6):

60–120-hour course: £649
121–170-hour course: £848
171–220-hour course: £997

Additional services:

Provider accreditation: free of charge
Expedited review (5 business days): additional 50% of the base accreditation fee
Appeal of accreditation decision: £150 (refundable if successful)
Certificate mailing (FedEx/UPS): £65 per certificate

The payment schedule, refund policy, and additional service fees are all disclosed on the pricing page. The homepage carries the claim "No hidden fees" across all three pricing tiers, which is broadly consistent with the level of published detail.

Source: https://otcac.com/ — accessed 14 May 2026
Source: https://otcac.com/pricing/ — accessed 14 May 2026

Terms and Conditions

No terms and conditions are published on the OTCAC website. An attempt to access https://otcac.com/terms/ on 14 May 2026 returned a 404 "Page not found" error. No link to terms and conditions was located in the site navigation, the footer, or on any page visited during this review.

The pricing page contains a refund policy and payment schedule (presented as Sections 6 and 5 respectively of the fee schedule document).
This does not constitute terms and conditions governing the commercial relationship between OTCAC and its clients. No provisions were identified covering the scope of accreditation granted, intellectual property rights in course materials submitted, conditions under which accreditation may be withdrawn, dispute resolution, or complaints procedures.

The published standards document (Standard VII, Section B) states that an institution's enrollment agreement or contract must provide "full disclosure of the rights, obligations, and responsibilities of all parties" and must be "furnished to appropriate parties before any payment or obligation is made." OTCAC applies this requirement to the institutions it assesses but does not appear to apply the equivalent standard to its own commercial relationship with clients.

Prospective clients are advised to request written terms before engaging with OTCAC, as no published contractual framework was accessible at the time of review.

Source: https://otcac.com/terms/ — accessed 14 May 2026 (404 error)
Source: https://otcac.com/pricing/ — accessed 14 May 2026
Source: https://otcac.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/OTCAC-Standards-for-Accreditation.pdf — accessed 14 May 2026

Individual Course Assessment

OTCAC states that it assesses individual courses. The pricing structure is organised by course length (60–120 hours, 121–170 hours, 171–220 hours), which is consistent with course-level assessment rather than blanket provider accreditation. The process description on the homepage indicates that course materials are accessed and checked following payment of the initial 50% deposit.

The published standards document supports this position, setting out criteria under Standard IV (Curricula) that address educational goals and objectives, programme materials, performance measurements, and curriculum review procedures, all at course level.

The organisation states that provider accreditation is available separately and free of charge, while course accreditation is a paid service. The distinction between provider-level and course-level assessment is noted.

No publicly accessible register of accredited courses was identified at the time of review. The "Courses" navigation link returned a 404 error on 14 May 2026, meaning the advertised directory of accredited courses is not publicly accessible.

Source: https://otcac.com/ — accessed 14 May 2026
Source: https://otcac.com/courses/ — accessed 14 May 2026 (404 error)
Source: https://otcac.com/pricing/ — accessed 14 May 2026
Source: https://otcac.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/OTCAC-Standards-for-Accreditation.pdf — accessed 14 May 2026

Review and Renewal

OTCAC operates a five-year re-accreditation cycle. After initial accreditation, annual membership fees apply in Years 2–5. The homepage describes this annual stage as a "stealth check only," and the pricing page confirms it includes an annual verification check and continued listing in the OTCAC directory.

Full re-accreditation is required at Year 6, at the applicable re-accreditation fee. The pricing page notes that courses which have "drastically changed" may need revision to realign with OTCAC's standards before re-accreditation is granted, which indicates that the five-year review involves substantive assessment rather than automatic renewal.

The published standards document (Standard IV, Section D) requires institutions to use "systematic and effective procedures to continuously monitor and improve the curriculum," incorporating feedback from students, graduates, and employers, and to conduct a comprehensive review of curriculum as it relates to expected learning outcomes. This mirrors the stated re-accreditation intent, though no detail is provided on how OTCAC verifies compliance with this standard between annual check-ins.

Source: https://otcac.com/ — accessed 14 May 2026
Source: https://otcac.com/pricing/ — accessed 14 May 2026
Source: https://otcac.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/OTCAC-Standards-for-Accreditation.pdf — accessed 14 May 2026

Sale of Training Courses or Materials

No evidence was found that OTCAC sells training courses or learning materials. The additional services offered — certificate design and certificate printing and postal mailing — are administrative services ancillary to the accreditation relationship and do not constitute training provision. No conflict of interest arises under this criterion.

Source: https://otcac.com/ — accessed 14 May 2026

Financial Relationships with Third-Party Service Providers

No financial relationships with third-party service providers — such as insurance providers, affiliate partners, or referral arrangements — were identified on the OTCAC website at the time of review. The site discloses that it accepts payment via Stripe and PayPal; this is a payment processing arrangement and does not constitute a commercial relationship of the type assessed under this criterion.

Source: https://otcac.com/pricing/ — accessed 14 May 2026

Ownership or Control Relationships with Aligned Commercial Interests

No ownership or control relationships with aligned commercial interests were identified. OTCAC does not appear to operate as part of a group of companies, and no cross-referencing between the accreditation service and affiliated training providers was identified on the website. As no legal entity has been identified on Companies House, a full assessment of directorship or control relationships cannot be conducted from public records.

Source: https://otcac.com/ — accessed 14 May 2026

Consistency of Filings with Advertised Activity

OTCAC cannot be verified against Companies House filings as no registered legal entity corresponding to the organisation was identified on the Companies House register at the time of review. It is therefore not possible to assess consistency between statutory filings and the organisation's advertised commercial activity.

The website states the organisation was "founded in 2019" and describes itself as "UK-based." No company registration number, incorporation date, or registered office address is disclosed. No filing history, confirmation statements, or accounts are accessible in relation to this organisation.

Source: https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/search?q=OTCAC — accessed 14 May 2026
Source: https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/search?q=Online+Teaching+Course+Accreditation+Committee — accessed 14 May 2026
Source: https://otcac.com/ — accessed 14 May 2026

Companies House Status

No entry was found on Companies House for OTCAC or "Online Teaching Course Accreditation Committee" as at 14 May 2026. Searches were conducted using both the trading abbreviation and the full stated name; neither returned a matching result.

The organisation describes itself on its website as "UK-registered" and states it is "registered with the UK government's UKRLP branch, meaning that we have been verified against a recognised legal source." The UK Register of Learning Providers (UKRLP) is an administrative register of learning providers managed by the Education and Skills Funding Agency. Registration with UKRLP does not constitute incorporation or registration as a legal entity under UK company law, does not confer accreditor status, and does not constitute government endorsement or recognition of any kind.

The absence of any identifiable Companies House entry means the legal form of this organisation — whether a company, partnership, sole trader, or unincorporated association — cannot be verified from public records. The legal standing of any accreditation granted by an entity with no verified legal form is accordingly uncertain.

Source: https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/search?q=OTCAC — accessed 14 May 2026
Source: https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/search?q=Online+Teaching+Course+Accreditation+Committee — accessed 14 May 2026
Source: https://otcac.com/ — accessed 14 May 2026

Website Status

The OTCAC website at https://otcac.com/ was active and serving commercial content at the time of review on 14 May 2026. However, several internal pages returned 404 errors or failed to resolve correctly:

https://otcac.com/terms/ — 404 error
https://otcac.com/privacy-policy/ — 404 error
https://otcac.com/courses/ — 404 error
https://otcac.com/accreditation-service/ — 404 error
https://otcac.com/accreditation-standards/ — redirects to homepage; no standards content served

The absence of a privacy policy page is notable given that the website operates contact forms that collect personal data from prospective clients and students. No privacy notice or data protection statement was accessible from any page reviewed.
Source: https://otcac.com/ — accessed 14 May 2026
Source: https://otcac.com/terms/ — accessed 14 May 2026 (404 error)
Source: https://otcac.com/privacy-policy/ — accessed 14 May 2026 (404 error)
Source: https://otcac.com/courses/ — accessed 14 May 2026 (404 error)
Source: https://otcac.com/accreditation-standards/ — accessed 14 May 2026 (redirects to homepage)

Regulatory Rulings and Public Enforcement Records

No ASA rulings, ICO enforcement notices, Trading Standards actions, or other published regulatory decisions were identified in relation to OTCAC or "The Online Teaching Course Accreditation Committee" at the time of review.

A search of the ASA rulings database for "OTCAC" returned no results on 14 May 2026. Searches of the ICO register of fee payers for "OTCAC" and "Online Teaching Course Accreditation" also returned no results, confirming that no data protection registration was identified for this organisation. The absence of ICO registration is noted separately in Section 11 and the Website Status section above.

Source: https://www.asa.org.uk/rulings/results/advanced-search.html?q=OTCAC&status=all — accessed 14 May 2026
Source: https://ico.org.uk/ESDWebPages/Search?search=OTCAC — accessed 14 May 2026
Source: https://ico.org.uk/ESDWebPages/Search?Name=Online+Teaching+Course+Accreditation — accessed 14 May 2026

Distinguishing CPD from Regulated Qualifications

OTCAC's homepage states that its accreditation process will enable course providers to offer "accredited or regulated courses to students." The use of the word "regulated" in this context is potentially misleading. OTCAC is not a recognised awarding organisation under Ofqual, Qualifications Wales, SQA Accreditation, or CCEA Regulation. It is not able to confer regulated qualification status on any course.

The website does not include any statement distinguishing its accreditation from regulated qualifications, nor any clarification that OTCAC accreditation does not constitute recognition by a statutory qualifications regulator.

The published standards document (Standard IV, Section E — Certification and Licensing) states that where "the purpose of instruction is to prepare students to meet the standards for certification, the curriculum includes appropriate preparation and materials to meet the requirements for such credentials." This language conflates accreditation with certification and does not distinguish between OTCAC's own accreditation and regulated qualifications or professional certifications issued by third-party bodies.

Consumers and course providers reviewing OTCAC's materials may not be able to identify clearly where OTCAC's accreditation ends and regulated qualification status, if applicable, begins.

Source: https://otcac.com/ — accessed 14 May 2026
Source: https://otcac.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/OTCAC-Standards-for-Accreditation.pdf — accessed 14 May 2026

Unsubstantiated Claims

Several claims made on the OTCAC website and in its published documentation are unsubstantiated or internally inconsistent:

Inconsistent organisation name across documents: The live website uses "Online Teaching Course Accreditation Committee," while the published standards document hosted on the same domain uses "Online Training Certification Accreditation Committee." No explanation is provided for this discrepancy.

Standards document predates stated founding: The standards document is dated January 2017, two years before the organisation's stated founding date of 2019. The document cannot have been developed by an organisation that did not yet exist. No explanation is provided.

"UK-registered accreditor": OTCAC states it is "a UK-registered accreditor" and that UKRLP registration means it "has been verified against a recognised legal source." UKRLP is an administrative register of learning providers and does not confer accreditor recognition, quality assurance standing, or legal entity status. No Companies House entry was identified for this organisation.

"Founded in 2019" / "Established in 2019": No Companies House entity or other public record corroborates these claims. The date is also inconsistent with the 2017 date on the published standards document.

"We have steadily grown in reputation and course provider accreditations": No public register of accredited providers or courses was accessible at the time of review. The "Courses" navigation link returned a 404 error. This claim cannot be independently verified.

"Unlike fake accreditors, we actually want to hear from new course providers": This comparative claim implies that named or unnamed competitors are fraudulent accreditors. Such a claim requires substantiation under the ASA CAP Code (rules 3.33–3.37 on comparative advertising and denigration). No substantiation is published.

"Our accredited courses truly reflect the gold standard of teaching excellence": This superlative claim is not substantiated by reference to any independent benchmark, external body, or published evidence.

Source: https://otcac.com/ — accessed 14 May 2026
Source: https://otcac.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/OTCAC-Standards-for-Accreditation.pdf — accessed 14 May 2026

Further Information about this organisation

Website
https://otcac.com/
Companies House Number
Not found
Companies House Incorporation Date
Not found
ICO Number
Not found
ICO Registration Date
Not found
Physical Office Published
No
Telephone
No
Email
Yes
Live Chat
No
Pricing Published
Yes
Accreditation Criteria Published
Yes
Activities Individually Accredited
Stated
Review Frequency
Stated
Last Updated
18th May 2026

Disclaimer

We do our best to ensure that all information is accurate and up to date. If you are part of the above-mentioned organisation and some of the information, we have found is inaccurate please contact us at [email protected] so we can rectify this for you.

Methodology and Criteria for CPD Accreditation Organisation Listings
Back to CPD Accreditation Organisation Rankings